From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdSHE-00031Z-Uu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:10:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdSHD-0002zl-3z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:10:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45183 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdSHD-0002zY-04 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:10:43 -0400 Received: from relay01.mx.bawue.net ([193.7.176.67]:43411) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KdSHC-0003Tx-KL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:10:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:10:37 +0200 From: Thiemo Seufer Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-nbd: inetd support Message-ID: <20080910161036.GA6180@networkno.de> References: <1220866212.4147.15.camel@frecb07144> <48C7E697.3050805@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48C7E697.3050805@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > Laurent Vivier wrote: >> This patch allows to put qemu-nbd in inetd.conf by using stdin/stdout >> instead of a socket. >> >> This behavior is enabled by specifying "--port=0". >> > > That's kind of non-intuitive. Why not just add a --inetd option or a > flag that explicitly means read from stdio? Or --port=-, probably? Thiemo