From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KdoVn-00078V-1g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:55:15 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KdoVl-00077S-1G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:55:14 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50858 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdoVk-000773-OV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:55:12 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]:34545)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1KdoVk-0006Vg-Aw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:55:12 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Don't use QEMU_VERSION in ATA/ATAPI replies
	to IDENTIFY cmds
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:55:07 +0100
References: <OF47F08F32.912096E4-ON852574C1.0001C90F@rapid7.com>
	<200809111458.57906.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<alpine.LFD.1.10.0809111613310.5768@bcny.fcbq.bet>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809111613310.5768@bcny.fcbq.bet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200809111655.08520.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Ian Kirk <blob@blob.co.uk>

> How often do you upgrade the firmware on your (real) hard drives ?
>
> For my 'hobby' equipment... never. In production, the only firmware
> changes i've seen are in storage arrays, e.g. NetApp/EMC. I'm assuming the
> change in the firmware of a SAN array doesn't really affect the host.

I told that Intel recommend you upgrade the firmware on their recent 
mainstream SSD.

Paul