From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: gcosta@redhat.com, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Make page_find() return 0 for too-large addresses
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:08:24 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080915130824.GA6066@poweredge.glommer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48CADEC2.3060204@codemonkey.ws>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 04:27:30PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 05:14:06PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:50:33PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>>> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On some cases, such as under KVM, tb_invalidate_phys_page_range()
>>>>> may be called for large addresses, when qemu is configured to more than
>>>>> 4GB of RAM.
>>>>>
>>>>> On these cases, qemu was crashing because it was using an index too
>>>>> large for l1_map[], that supports only 32-bit addresses when compiling
>>>>> without CONFIG_USER_ONLY.
>>>>>
>> <snip>
>>
>
> So... are you building with kqemu enabled? If so,
> TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS will be 32. So I don't think this sort of
> work-around is correct. A better solution would be to validate ram_size
> against TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS.
>
> To put it another way, if you have kqemu enabled (at build time), you
> cannot use > ~4GB of memory for the guest.
I can be very wrong here, but page_find() does not seem to limit our ability to
run guests if > 4GB, as it is only concerned about the code translation layer.
Differently from phys_page_find(), that does manage physical memory, and even
presented problems about it in the past.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-15 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-12 18:58 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Make page_find() return 0 for too-large addresses Eduardo Habkost
2008-09-12 19:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2008-09-12 20:14 ` Eduardo Habkost
2008-09-12 20:44 ` Eduardo Habkost
2008-09-12 21:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-12 21:47 ` Eduardo Habkost
2008-09-15 13:08 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2008-09-15 15:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-15 15:48 ` Eduardo Habkost
2008-09-15 15:57 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080915130824.GA6066@poweredge.glommer \
--to=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).