qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kirill@shutemov.name
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:08:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080918090821.GA17893@kos.to> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <761ea48b0809180023t37d300ceq790fe33c5ab7602a@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 09:23:20AM +0200, Laurent Desnogues wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 01:54:21AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:

> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-09/msg00439.html ,
> >> it looks cleaner to me.

> > Kirill's patch looks good to me.

> There's a functional difference between Kirill's patch and yours:

> Kirill +            ret = get_errno(futimesat(arg1, p, tvp));
> you   +                ret = get_errno(sys_futimesat(arg1, path(p), tv));

The sbox patch defines sys_futimesat earlier in the file, presumably to
deal with supporting a stone-age version of libc/kernel headers.
path() is related to interp_prefix. The old utimes handlers don't use
path() either, and it's unlikely that any library-loading routine uses
futimes(). Thus, I believe Kirill's version is more correct.

That said, path() should probably renamed to something more obvious
(interp_path() ?), or path mangling could be made more generic (allowing
things like chroot() emulation).

-- 
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-18  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-17 19:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall Riku Voipio
2008-09-17 23:54 ` andrzej zaborowski
2008-09-18  5:00   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-09-18  6:30   ` Riku Voipio
2008-09-18  7:23     ` Laurent Desnogues
2008-09-18  9:08       ` Riku Voipio [this message]
2008-09-18  9:28         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-09-18  9:42           ` Riku Voipio
2008-09-18 10:16             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-09-18 11:13               ` Thiemo Seufer
2008-09-18 11:45                 ` Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080918090821.GA17893@kos.to \
    --to=riku.voipio@iki.fi \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).