From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KgHwP-0001s7-Gk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:44:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KgHwN-0001rp-Ui for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:44:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54128 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KgHwN-0001rl-RO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:44:55 -0400 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.145]:39611) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KgHwN-00044n-BX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:44:55 -0400 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so1485393eyk.4 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:44:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:45:36 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall Message-ID: <20080918114535.GC9799@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080917194533.GB21187@kos.to> <20080918063007.GA26841@kos.to> <761ea48b0809180023t37d300ceq790fe33c5ab7602a@mail.gmail.com> <20080918090821.GA17893@kos.to> <20080918092826.GA5059@localhost.localdomain> <20080918094234.GA23737@kos.to> <20080918101629.GB9799@localhost.localdomain> <20080918111340.GB19245@networkno.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080918111340.GB19245@networkno.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thiemo Seufer Cc: Riku Voipio , qemu-devel@nongnu.org --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 01:13:40PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:42:34PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:28:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:08:21PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > > I don't think that it's great idea. If libc/kernel headers doesn't = provide > > > > the syscall we shouldn't implement them. The exception is syscalls = without > > > > libc's wrapper. Like gettid(2). > > >=20 > > > Well, defining syscalls appears to be a common practice in qemu for t= he > > > *at family of syscalls (openat, linkat, ...), so it doesn't seem that > > > far off for futimesat(). > >=20 > > *at syscalls ware implemented in linux 2.6.16. glibc's wrappers to this > > syscalls were implemented in glibc 2.4. Both of them relesed more than = two > > and half years ago. > >=20 > > I think we can drop this crap now. >=20 > Current Debian stable uses glibc 2.3.6. Hm... Ok, I'll fix my patches. --=20 Regards, Kirill A. Shutemov + Belarus, Minsk + ALT Linux Team, http://www.altlinux.com/ --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjSP18ACgkQbWYnhzC5v6pjBQCgjhX5tVMp0ye/BTjY/TnAekQP y64AniqmHLu3KGNyi/tH//LYVaa8mhTn =/TVq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef--