From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ki6gs-0002Eh-BV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:08:26 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ki6gq-0002Dx-An
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:08:25 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51603 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ki6gq-0002Dt-7I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:08:24 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]:48722)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1Ki6gp-0004Ok-JZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:08:23 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] move MAX_CPUS to cpu.h
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:08:15 +0100
References: <48D8D694.1000609@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <48D8D694.1000609@sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200809231308.16398.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>

On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Index: qemu/target-arm/cpu.h
> ===================================================================
> --- qemu.orig/target-arm/cpu.h
> +++ qemu/target-arm/cpu.h
> +#define MAX_CPUS 1

Anything using the value to allocate per-cpu structures will be wrong.

Paul