From: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Move aio implementation out of raw block driver
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:39:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080923143909.GK31395@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D85849.2080302@us.ibm.com>
* Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> [2008-09-22 21:52]:
> Ryan Harper wrote:
> >+//#define DEBUG_BLOCK_AIO
> >+#if defined(DEBUG_BLOCK_AIO)
> >+#define BLPRINTF(formatCstr, args...) do { fprintf(stderr, formatCstr,
> >##args); fflush(stderr); } while (0)
> >
>
> This is GCC syntax. You should use C99 syntax. That would be:
>
> #define BLPRINTF(fmt, ...) do { fprintf(stderr, fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); }
> while (0)
>
> stderr is defined to not be buffered so an explicit fflush is
> unnecessary. formatCstr is also a goofy name :-)
>
> >+#else
> >+#define BLPRINTF(formatCstr, args...)
> >
>
> should be defined to do { } while (0) to maintain statement semantics.
This was taken from block-raw-posix.c, DEBUG_BLOCK. I'll change up the
DEBUG_BLOCK_AIO, should I also submit a patch to rework DEBUG_BLOCK?
> >+typedef struct AIODriver
> >+{
> >+ const char *name;
> >+ RawAIOCB *(*submit)(BlockDriverState *bs, int fd,
> >+ int64_t sector_num, uint8_t *buf,
> >+ int sectors, int write,
> >+ BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb,
> >+ void *opaque);
> >+ void (*cancel)(BlockDriverAIOCB *aiocb);
> >+ int (*flush)(void *opaque);
> >+} AIODriver;
> >
>
> I think the AIODriver interface should just take an fd, a completion
> function, and an opaque pointer. It should have to have knowledge of
> BDRVRawState or BlockDriverState.
I assume you mean shouldn't have to have. Looking at things like
pa_read() in aio-posix.c , I'm not sure I see how I avoid that
knowledge.
> >*raw_aio_read(BlockDriverState *bs,
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> >- acb = raw_aio_setup(bs, sector_num, buf, nb_sectors, cb, opaque);
> >- if (!acb)
> >+ if (fd_open(bs) < 0)
> > return NULL;
> >- if (aio_read(&acb->aiocb) < 0) {
> >- qemu_aio_release(acb);
> >+
> >+ /* submit read */
> >+ acb = s->aio_dvr->submit(bs, s->fd, sector_num, buf, nb_sectors, 0,
> >cb,
> >+ opaque);
> >+ if (!acb)
> > return NULL;
> >- }
> > return &acb->common;
> > }
> >
>
> So what happens if !defined(CONFIG_AIO)? By my reading of the code,
> aio_drv will be NULL and this will SEGV.
raw_aio_read/write/cancel aren't included in the bdrv structure unless
CONFIG_AIO is defined. Rather in bdrv_register, the aio emulation
functions are used instead.
> >+ /* init aio driver for this block device */
> >+ s->aio_dvr = posix_aio_init();
> >
>
> Doesn't this need to be conditional on CONFIG_AIO?
Yep, in both raw_open and hdev_open().
Thanks for the review.
--
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-23 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-22 23:17 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Refactor AIO to allow multiple AIO implementations Ryan Harper
2008-09-22 23:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Only call aio flush handler if set Ryan Harper
2008-09-23 2:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2008-09-23 14:26 ` Ryan Harper
2008-09-23 14:34 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-23 14:41 ` Ryan Harper
2008-09-23 14:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-22 23:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] Move aio implementation out of raw block driver Ryan Harper
2008-09-23 1:16 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ryan Harper
2008-09-23 2:45 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-23 14:39 ` Ryan Harper [this message]
2008-09-23 14:40 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-23 14:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-09-23 16:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-23 18:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-09-23 18:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-24 22:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-22 23:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ryan Harper
2008-09-23 1:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Add linux aio implementation for raw block devices Ryan Harper
2008-09-23 3:32 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] Refactor AIO to allow multiple AIO implementations Anthony Liguori
2008-09-23 14:43 ` Ryan Harper
2008-09-23 14:47 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-23 16:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-23 10:27 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jamie Lokier
2008-10-02 22:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " john cooper
2008-10-03 13:33 ` Ryan Harper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080923143909.GK31395@us.ibm.com \
--to=ryanh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).