From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KiGQL-0002mY-HY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:32:01 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KiGQK-0002lx-3p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:32:01 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37075 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KiGQJ-0002lt-Rd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:31:59 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]:44801)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1KiGQJ-0000Wt-DP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:31:59 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [5283] Use the new concat_tl_i64 op for std and stda
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:31:52 +0100
References: <20080923174506.X10311@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>
	<200809232259.24692.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20080923180629.I10486@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20080923180629.I10486@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200809232331.55351.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> >> The new code generates:
> >>     movi_i64 tmp12,$0x20
> >>     shl_i64 tmp10,loc4,tmp12
> >>     or_i64 tmp2,tmp0,tmp10
> >>     qemu_st64 tmp2,loc5,$0x0
> >
> > The extension should be immediately before the code you quote here.
>
> Nope, in both cases the preceeding code is identical:

Ah, I see what's going on now.  Fixed.

Paul