From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Kk4eS-0005QZ-0P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:22:04 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Kk4eQ-0005NH-Aw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:22:03 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42686 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kk4eQ-0005N7-5l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:22:02 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]:55949)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1Kk4eP-0003Hu-F3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:22:02 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] [x86] Core 2 Duo specification
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:21:04 +0100
References: <48A0165A.9090801@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <48A0165A.9090801@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200809282321.05440.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>

On Monday 11 August 2008, Alexander Graf wrote:
> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0.name =3D "core2duo",
> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0/* the original CPU does have many more features that ar=
e not
> implemented yet */

Any chance you could provide exact details of the missing features, like we=
=20
have to the n270? I dislike vague "there's something missing here" comments=
=20
because it's extremely hard to figure out whether they're still valid.

Paul