From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KkfyE-0004Zq-CH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:12:58 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KkfyC-0004ZF-Gw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:12:57 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50123 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkfyC-0004ZC-DP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:12:56 -0400
Received: from csl.cornell.edu ([128.84.224.10]:2419 helo=vlsi.csl.cornell.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <vince@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>) id 1KkfyC-0000sf-2G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:12:56 -0400
Received: from stanley.csl.cornell.edu (stanley.csl.cornell.edu
	[128.84.224.15])
	by vlsi.csl.cornell.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m8UECiGV046475
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:12:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:12:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vince@csl.cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] PATCH: fix usb-linux.c compile orror
In-Reply-To: <48E1830D.1000903@codemonkey.ws>
Message-ID: <20080930100908.N47083@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>
References: <48DFD2D9.6060205@earthlink.net> <48E0FEB4.8000208@codemonkey.ws>
	<48E178BE.70508@earthlink.net> <48E1830D.1000903@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Robert Reif wrote:
>> RH9 system (2.4.20-31.9smp).
>
> Huh.  I'm amazed it compiles with just that change on such an old kernel.

I have similar problems compiling on a SuSE 10.1 system which really isn't 
that old.  Since I only use linux-user I'd been too lazy to investigate 
the problem.

Why should Qemu not build on older systems?  I'd imagine that linux 2.4 / 
2.6 compatability would be easier to handle than linux /OSX /Windows 
compatability.

Vince