From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] Reallocate dma buffers in read/write path if needed
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 01:00:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810040100.28341.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48E6AC36.3060404@codemonkey.ws>
On Saturday 04 October 2008, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
> > On Friday 03 October 2008, Ryan Harper wrote:
> >> The default buffer size breaks up larger read/write requests
> >> unnecessarily. When we encounter requests larger than the default dma
> >> buffer, reallocate the buffer to support the request.
> >
> > Allocating unboundedly large host buffers based on guest input seems like
> > a bad idea.
>
> Perhaps they could be at least bound to phys_ram_size.
That's still way too large. It means that the maximum host footprint of qemu
is many times the size of the guest RAM. There's a good chance that the host
machine doesn't even have enough virtual address space to satisfy this
request.
I expect that the only situation where you can only avoid breaking up large
transfers when you have zero-copy IO. Previous zero-copy/vectored IO patches
suffered from a similar problem: It is not acceptable to allocate huge chunks
of host ram when you fallback to normal IO.
> In general, I don't think there's a correct size to bound them that's
> less than phys_ram_size. The guest may be issuing really big IO requests.
Qemu is perfectly capable of handling large IO requests by splitting them into
multiple smaller requests. Enlarging the size of this buffer is just a
secondary performance optimisation.
Admittedly we don't currently limit the number of simultaneous commands a
guest can submit, but that's relatively easy to fix.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-04 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-03 22:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Improve emulated scsi write performance Ryan Harper
2008-10-03 22:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] lsi_queue_command: add dma direction parameter Ryan Harper
2008-10-03 22:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] Refactor lsi_do_command to queue read and write ops Ryan Harper
2008-10-03 22:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] Refactor scsi-disk layer for queue'ing writes Ryan Harper
2008-10-03 22:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] Reallocate dma buffers in read/write path if needed Ryan Harper
2008-10-03 23:17 ` Paul Brook
2008-10-03 23:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-10-04 0:00 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2008-10-04 10:00 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <20081004135749.pphehrhuw9w4gwsc@imap.linux.ibm.com>
2008-10-04 21:47 ` Ryan Harper
2008-10-04 22:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-10-05 5:23 ` Avi Kivity
2008-10-05 23:06 ` Ryan Harper
2008-10-06 7:27 ` Avi Kivity
2008-10-04 23:00 ` Paul Brook
2008-10-05 5:29 ` Avi Kivity
2008-10-05 23:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Improve emulated scsi write performance Ryan Harper
2008-10-13 16:15 ` Ryan Harper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810040100.28341.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ryanh@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).