From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Kn7bX-0005g6-Ux
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:07:39 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Kn7bX-0005fu-6d
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:07:39 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46734 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kn7bX-0005fr-0v
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:07:39 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:15580)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>)
	id 1Kn7bW-0003SJ-K3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:07:38 -0400
Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1Kn7bS-00059U-OT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:07:34 -0400
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:07:24 +0200
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Fire SIGIO when IO requests are
	completed
Message-ID: <20081007080724.GA15274@hall.aurel32.net>
References: <48EA4E5D.50708@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <48EA4E5D.50708@codemonkey.ws>
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:43:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi Blue Swirl,
> 
> Can you test the attached patch with sparc-softmmu?  Better yet, do you 
> have an image, or a recipe for an image that I could use to try and 
> reproduce the problem?  The sparc test code on the QEMU website just 
> uses a ram disk so the regression isn't evident with it.

Your patch works perfectly with -clock unix, but the problem is still
present here with -clock dynticks.

If you want to test the problem, you can download an image file from
http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu

BTW I wonder if we should also fire SIGIO on the network device.

Aurelien

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net