From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KnIcb-0004tV-Ex for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:53:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KnIca-0004t5-16 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:53:29 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32939 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KnIcZ-0004t2-RG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:53:27 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]:52665) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KnIcY-0005t4-R8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:53:27 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [5440] Add sparse checker support to the build system (Gerd Hoffman) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 20:53:07 +0100 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810072053.10550.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tuesday 07 October 2008, Anthony Liguori wrote: > +echo " =C2=A0--disable-sparse =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 disable sparse= checker" Given this is disabled by default, shouldn't we be=20 documenting --enable-sparse?