From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Bluetooth options
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:06:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810111306.13436.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb249edb0810110418v84eaec2pc18af6f3baea92e5@mail.gmail.com>
> > Do we really need 3 different options? Can't everything be done with a
> > single -bt option, like it is with -net?
>
> We can and then the syntax is more like with -net and less like with
> -usbdevice, the attached patch does that instead.
This looks better to me.
> The syntax is now:
> -bt hci,null
> -bt hci,host[:id]
Shouldn't these also have vlan arguments?
> -bt hci[,vlan=N]
> -bt vhci[,vlan=N]
> -bt device:dev[,vlan=N]
I think you're being somewhat inconsistent about the option syntax. Using -bt
hci for null/"standard" emulated HCI and host hci passthrough but not vhci is
particularly unintuitive.
The device: qualifier seems like it should be redundant. Unlike USB which is a
single master bus, bluetooth network topology is peer-peer with master/slave
roles being negotiated on a per-connection basis.
Is there any point having a "null" HCI?
I'd expect something along the lines of:
-bt null[...]
-bt hci[...]
-bt vhci[...]
-bt host[,id=N][...]
-bt sdp[...]
Obviously this all needs documentation before it is committed ;-)
I'm a little confused what the point of the null hci is. Is this a hci that
isn't connected to anything else, in which case how is it different to a
default hci without anything else on the scatternet. Or is it a dummy test
device that just rejects all connections attempts, in which case calling it a
HCI seems misleading.
> > I'd kinda expect serial bluetooth dongles to be added the same way as USB
> > ones, i.e. via -serial options.
>
> The serial dongle emulated in hw/bt-hci-csr.c has some vendor
> extensions so it's not a standard serial dongle. It's attached by the
> machine code because this part is not configurable in n8x0. One can
> add support for attaching hot-pluggable serial dongles in vl.c if
> needed.
That sounds like an n8x0 bug. I'm not requiring it be fixed now, but it feels
like something that should go away.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-11 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-29 1:27 [Qemu-devel] Bluetooth options andrzej zaborowski
2008-09-29 10:54 ` Paul Brook
2008-10-11 11:18 ` andrzej zaborowski
2008-10-11 12:06 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2008-10-11 12:51 ` andrzej zaborowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810111306.13436.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).