From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KpQ6u-0007IZ-B1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:17:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KpQ6s-0007HW-Oi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:17:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48305 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KpQ6s-0007HR-F4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:17:30 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:57502) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KpQ6s-0006kO-A3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:17:30 -0400 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9DG6asW030062 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:06:36 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m9DGFEJc201956 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:15:17 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m9DGFDjv002835 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:15:13 -0600 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:15:11 -0500 From: Ryan Harper Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Improve emulated scsi write performance Message-ID: <20081013161511.GD21410@us.ibm.com> References: <1223071531-31817-1-git-send-email-ryanh@us.ibm.com> <20081005230847.GJ31395@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081005230847.GJ31395@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Anthony Liguori , kvm@vger.kernel.org * Ryan Harper [2008-10-05 18:08]: > > Any comments/review for patches 1-3? It seems that patch4 is something > that we need to work out before committing, but I'd like to see pathes > 1-3 go in since they provide a performance boost in and of themselves. Any movement here on getting 1-3 in tree? -- Ryan Harper Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center IBM Corp., Austin, Tx (512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253 ryanh@us.ibm.com