From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kxvkp-0006RP-1I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:41:55 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kxvkm-0006Qu-76 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:41:53 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39143 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kxvkm-0006Qr-4L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:41:52 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:41020) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kxvkl-0001ie-UA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:41:52 -0500 Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Kxvkg-0007Uz-Cp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:41:46 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:41:46 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND][PATCH 0/3] Fix guest time drift under heavy load. Message-ID: <20081106034144.GA26160@shareable.org> References: <20081029152236.14831.15193.stgit@dhcp-1-237.local> <490B59BF.3000205@codemonkey.ws> <20081102130441.GD16809@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081102130441.GD16809@redhat.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gleb Natapov wrote: > > How do > > Linux guests behave with this? > Linux guests don't use pit or RTC for time keeping. They are completely > unaffected by those patches. Older Linux guests do, and those booted with clock=pit. -- Jamie