From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KyFpO-0003jS-NT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:07:58 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KyFpN-0003iC-HX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:07:57 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47687 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KyFpN-0003hz-Am
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:07:57 -0500
Received: from sprocket.fensystems.co.uk ([212.13.204.53]:49626)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mcb30@etherboot.org>) id 1KyFGX-0003oI-Mx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:31:58 -0500
From: Michael Brown <mcb30@etherboot.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 00:31:35 +0000
References: <20081103092620.8058.91416.stgit@dhcp-1-237.local>
	<20081103092646.8058.1107.stgit@dhcp-1-237.local>
	<20081107002552.GA31207@morn.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20081107002552.GA31207@morn.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200811070031.35786.mcb30@etherboot.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Bochs-developers] [PATCH v2 5/6] Don't use
	unreserved memory	in BIOS.
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: bochs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>

On Friday 07 November 2008 00:25:52 Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> Random note - I'm told that some option roms can relocate the EBDA.

Correct; there's even a defined protocol somewhere for doing this.  
Etherboot/gPXE ROMs won't touch the EBDA, FWIW.

Michael