From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6v8z-0005Ve-N3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:52:01 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6v8y-0005VB-EE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:52:01 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37513 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L6v8y-0005V5-2k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:52:00 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:39425) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L6v8x-0007PP-L3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:51:59 -0500 Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L6v8n-00014R-Tm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:51:49 +0000 Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:51:49 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/2] pci-dma-api-v1 Message-ID: <20081130225149.GA3845@shareable.org> References: <20081127123538.GC10348@random.random> <20081128015602.GA31011@random.random> <20081128185001.GD31011@random.random> <493315DB.5060102@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <493315DB.5060102@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > Yes, that's ridiculous. There's a thread right now on > linux-aio@vger.kernel.org discussing the future of linux-aio. The > prevailing wisdom seems to be that linux-aio does not have a future. I think you meant linux-aio@kvack.org, btw. -- Jamie