From: Luca Bigliardi <shammash@artha.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ?
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:09:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081204170920.GD21175@pintsize> (raw)
Hi qemu/kvm devels!
I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual
network and not 802.1Q .
I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then
mark vlan option deprecated somehow.
Is it ok for you?
Thank you,
luca
--
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers.
-- Leonard Brandwein
http://shammash.homelinux.org/ - http://www.artha.org/ - http://www.yue.it/
next reply other threads:[~2008-12-04 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-04 17:09 Luca Bigliardi [this message]
2008-12-06 12:00 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ? Thomas Mueller
2008-12-06 13:33 ` Kristoffer Ericson
2008-12-06 18:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-12-06 18:34 ` nuitari-qemu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081204170920.GD21175@pintsize \
--to=shammash@artha.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).