From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L8Hhi-0001xk-0T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:09:30 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L8Hhg-0001wz-IT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:09:29 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40718 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L8Hhg-0001wv-9d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:09:28 -0500 Received: from tallyho.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.81.166]:51770) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L8Hhf-0002tc-Un for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:09:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:09:20 +0100 From: Luca Bigliardi Message-ID: <20081204170920.GD21175@pintsize> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi qemu/kvm devels! I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual network and not 802.1Q . I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then mark vlan option deprecated somehow. Is it ok for you? Thank you, luca -- Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein http://shammash.homelinux.org/ - http://www.artha.org/ - http://www.yue.it/