qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ?
@ 2008-12-04 17:09 Luca Bigliardi
  2008-12-06 12:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " Thomas Mueller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luca Bigliardi @ 2008-12-04 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: kvm


Hi qemu/kvm devels!

I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual
network and not 802.1Q .

I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then
mark vlan option deprecated somehow.

Is it ok for you?


Thank you,

luca

-- 
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers.
                        -- Leonard Brandwein

http://shammash.homelinux.org/ - http://www.artha.org/ - http://www.yue.it/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] Re: vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ?
  2008-12-04 17:09 [Qemu-devel] vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ? Luca Bigliardi
@ 2008-12-06 12:00 ` Thomas Mueller
  2008-12-06 13:33   ` Kristoffer Ericson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Mueller @ 2008-12-06 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: kvm


> 
> I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual
> network and not 802.1Q .
> 
> I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then
> mark vlan option deprecated somehow.

my vote for renaming. would have saved me a lot of time once.

- Thomas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ?
  2008-12-06 12:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " Thomas Mueller
@ 2008-12-06 13:33   ` Kristoffer Ericson
  2008-12-06 18:14     ` Jamie Lokier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kristoffer Ericson @ 2008-12-06 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: kvm, Thomas Mueller

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 508 bytes --]

On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 12:00:13 +0000 (UTC)
Thomas Mueller <thomas@chaschperli.ch> wrote:

> 
> > 
> > I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual
> > network and not 802.1Q .
> > 
> > I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then
> > mark vlan option deprecated somehow.
> 
> my vote for renaming. would have saved me a lot of time once.
> 

Same here.

> - Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ?
  2008-12-06 13:33   ` Kristoffer Ericson
@ 2008-12-06 18:14     ` Jamie Lokier
  2008-12-06 18:34       ` nuitari-qemu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jamie Lokier @ 2008-12-06 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Thomas Mueller, kvm

Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> > > I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual
> > > network and not 802.1Q .
> > > 
> > > I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then
> > > mark vlan option deprecated somehow.
> > 
> > my vote for renaming. would have saved me a lot of time once.
> 
> Same here.

Me too! :-)

-- Jamie

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ?
  2008-12-06 18:14     ` Jamie Lokier
@ 2008-12-06 18:34       ` nuitari-qemu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: nuitari-qemu @ 2008-12-06 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: kvm, Thomas Mueller

> Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
>>>> I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual
>>>> network and not 802.1Q .
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then
>>>> mark vlan option deprecated somehow.
>>>
>>> my vote for renaming. would have saved me a lot of time once.
>>
>> Same here.
>
> Me too! :-)

Me too.

Maybe the manual should come with a warning for people that want to run 
multiple QEMUs with taps and a bridge on the host.

I had this setup:
br0 (public ip) -> qemu0 to qemu9

br1 (private ip) -> qemu10 to qemu20

I have one of each on each virtual machine and it get into a nice loop 
because qemu didn't separate traffic properly without the vlan option.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-06 18:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-04 17:09 [Qemu-devel] vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ? Luca Bigliardi
2008-12-06 12:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " Thomas Mueller
2008-12-06 13:33   ` Kristoffer Ericson
2008-12-06 18:14     ` Jamie Lokier
2008-12-06 18:34       ` nuitari-qemu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).