From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L8wKq-0008H5-KS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:32:36 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L8wKo-0008EJ-UO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:32:36 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33981 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L8wKo-0008E0-K6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:32:34 -0500
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189]:64601)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>) id 1L8wKo-0004mw-2Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:32:34 -0500
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so216519nfb.12
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:32:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:33:46 +0100
From: Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ?
Message-Id: <20081206143346.0b447bdd.kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ghdpgd$6u5$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20081204170920.GD21175@pintsize>
	<ghdpgd$6u5$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg="PGP-SHA1";
	boundary="Signature=_Sat__6_Dec_2008_14_33_46_+0100_R3k=9Bpj50VjD715"
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Mueller <thomas@chaschperli.ch>

--Signature=_Sat__6_Dec_2008_14_33_46_+0100_R3k=9Bpj50VjD715
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 12:00:13 +0000 (UTC)
Thomas Mueller <thomas@chaschperli.ch> wrote:

>=20
> >=20
> > I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual
> > network and not 802.1Q .
> >=20
> > I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then
> > mark vlan option deprecated somehow.
>=20
> my vote for renaming. would have saved me a lot of time once.
>=20

Same here.

> - Thomas
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20


--=20
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>

--Signature=_Sat__6_Dec_2008_14_33_46_+0100_R3k=9Bpj50VjD715
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkk6fzoACgkQPQls10ERAGe8uQCeJc9c94GP5nTlh2JrA3uUbVPA
Q8kAnA5uS8QhXUra1DGqfyaZC2KVwLQZ
=HyMg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sat__6_Dec_2008_14_33_46_+0100_R3k=9Bpj50VjD715--