From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L91g2-0001NO-Nc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:14:50 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L91g1-0001Mf-Qt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:14:50 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41358 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L91g1-0001MW-H9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:14:49 -0500
Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:48581)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1L91g1-0007Mc-6Z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:14:49 -0500
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 18:14:43 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ?
Message-ID: <20081206181442.GA8326@shareable.org>
References: <20081204170920.GD21175@pintsize> <ghdpgd$6u5$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<20081206143346.0b447bdd.kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20081206143346.0b447bdd.kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Thomas Mueller <thomas@chaschperli.ch>, kvm@vger.kernel.org

Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> > > I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual
> > > network and not 802.1Q .
> > > 
> > > I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then
> > > mark vlan option deprecated somehow.
> > 
> > my vote for renaming. would have saved me a lot of time once.
> 
> Same here.

Me too! :-)

-- Jamie