From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LA5Ip-00068T-TA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:19:16 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LA5Ip-000684-2S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:19:15 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46017 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LA5Io-00067y-VJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:19:15 -0500
Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123]:62377)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <acmay@acmay.homeip.net>) id 1LA5Io-0004Hu-HS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:19:14 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([76.88.95.122])
	by cdptpa-omta05.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id
	<20081209161912.NWVT29639.cdptpa-omta05.mail.rr.com@localhost.localdomain>
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:19:12 +0000
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:19:05 -0800
From: Andrew May <acmay@acmay.homeip.net>
Message-ID: <20081209081905.0936fa52@acmay.homeip.net>
In-Reply-To: <20081208001735.0244e189@acmay.homeip.net>
References: <20081208001735.0244e189@acmay.homeip.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: 4xx TLB fixes
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 00:17:35 -0800
Andrew May <acmay@acmay.homeip.net> wrote:

> I don't all the details of the 4xx MMU stuff, but I think these 2
> fixes for the tlb handling are correct.

No the patch isn't up to date. But I just tried to merge it and things
have gone backwards for me.
And I am kicking myself for not saving off logs to compare how things
are going wrong.

It seems that inside linux "setup_arg_pages()" calls
"move_page_tables()".
And when the code tries to return back to setup_arg_pages(), it fails
to find the kernel code that was just there.
The get_phys_addr_code() does a cpu_abort there, but I don't see that
the MMU code is being checked there.

I haven't been able to debug it too much more.

ps: I am not on the list so, please cc me.