From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LAL0w-0003fy-LG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:05:50 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LAL0t-0003fm-UP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:05:48 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49798 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LAL0t-0003fj-LD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:05:47 -0500
Received: from [84.20.150.76] (port=49774 helo=narury.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <nchip@kos.to>) id 1LAL0t-0005RC-2Z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:05:47 -0500
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:05:40 +0200
From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] evdev_keycode_map
Message-ID: <20081210090540.GA28944@kos.to>
References: <d9c105ea0809241610g39c2e2dfn20c66c81de8af446@mail.gmail.com>
	<20081209224235.GA12529@kos.to> <1228898223.8054.10.camel@t61p>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1228898223.8054.10.camel@t61p>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:37:03AM -0800, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 00:42 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > Anyone know why this patch is still lingering?

> FYI, I submitted it to the upstream QEMU project.  It may have already
> made it in there.

Well it's not, and that is precisely why I replied to the mail where
you dropped to the patch to the qemu list.. I also had some questions
of your patch in the mail.


--=20
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJP4ZkibPvMsrqrwMRAl8oAJ923CObsUYp4FzvMhFpvtd0+hsC8wCgskuL
OxjPosFJtpDFJPb4OLXurNA=
=wN61
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--