From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCeSG-0003rQ-EQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:15:36 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCeSE-0003qM-Ud for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:15:35 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34989 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LCeSE-0003qH-Kk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:15:34 -0500 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:44263) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LCeSE-0006Mg-6n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:15:34 -0500 Received: from d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.107]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBGIDo31024773 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:13:50 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id mBGIFFXd047226 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:15:16 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mBGIF73F016463 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:15:08 -0700 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:15:00 -0500 From: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [6064] Implement device tree support needed for Bamboo emulation Message-ID: <20081216181500.GA22917@localhost.localdomain> References: <200812161230.24052.paul@codesourcery.com> <1229440187.31337.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081216164628.GG20024@redhat.com> <1229447752.31337.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1229447752.31337.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Hollis Blanchard Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno , Paul Brook On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:15:52AM -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote: >> > FWIW, I have requested that Fedora and Debian package libfdt, and they >> > agreed in principle, but it's still missing in Fedora 10 for example. >> >> If you've got a package review ticket open against Fedora for libfdt >> inclusion, let me know the bug number and I'm happy to do the review, >> so it is not unduely delayed on its path into Fedora repositories. > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443882 > >IIRC Josh Boyer looked into this beyond what's reflected in the bug >report, but I don't remember the current status. I did. I submitted a patch and had a couple comments come back on it. I think I need to fixup the testsuite in dtc to link against and use the .so that is created and it should be OK for inclusion. josh