From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCfSg-0003vp-E0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:20:06 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCfSd-0003ue-CY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:20:05 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59279 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LCfSd-0003uU-1u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:20:03 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:41688) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LCfSc-0001rn-MR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:20:02 -0500 Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LCfSX-0004LJ-R4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:19:57 +0000 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:19:57 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add rtl8139b Message-ID: <20081216191957.GA15605@shareable.org> References: <200812141850.mBEIoBtN019561@smtp11.dti.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200812141850.mBEIoBtN019561@smtp11.dti.ne.jp> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org takasi-y@ops.dti.ne.jp wrote: > + " ne2k_pci pcnet rtl8139 rtl8139b e1000\n"); On seeing this in qemu output, and with no documentation, it suggests "rtl8139b" is a later device revision than "rtl8139", and preferable to use for new VMs. Imho it would be better to write " rtl8139b rtl8139 " and of course document that rtl8139b is an older device than rtl8139. -- Jamie