From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] cache slot lookup
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:00:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081218110014.GI23277@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081218104850.GB19123@poweredge.glommer>
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:48:50AM -0200, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:41:24AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> record slot used in last lookup. For the common mmio case,
> >> we'll usually access the same memory slot repeatedly.
> >>
> >
> >> --- a/kvm-all.c
> >> +++ b/kvm-all.c
> >> @@ -75,16 +75,25 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_alloc_slot(KVMState *s)
> >> return NULL;
> >> }
> >> +static KVMSlot *last_slot = NULL;
> >> +
> >> static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_slot(KVMState *s, target_phys_addr_t start_addr)
> >> {
> >> int i;
> >> +
> >> + if (last_slot && (start_addr >= last_slot->start_addr &&
> >> + start_addr < (last_slot->start_addr + last_slot->memory_size)))
> >> + return last_slot;
> >> +
> >> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
> >> KVMSlot *mem = &s->slots[i];
> >> if (start_addr >= mem->start_addr &&
> >> - start_addr < (mem->start_addr + mem->memory_size))
> >> + start_addr < (mem->start_addr + mem->memory_size)) {
> >> + last_slot = mem;
> >> return mem;
> >> + }
> >> }
> >>
> >
> > This wasn't introduced by this patch, but the comparison is broken ion
> > i386 hosts, where target_phys_addr_t is 32 bits wide. mem->start_addr +
> > mem->memory_size can overflow (this in fact happens for the bios slot at
> > 4G-128K)
>
> AFAIK, the assumption is that kvm will always be qemu-system-x86_64, due to
> migration issues. Then, _target_ phys_addr_t is always 64 bit wide.
> If it's not the case, then this is really a problem.
Migration compatability is a problem for mgmt apps to solve & merely
saying to use qemu-system-x86_64 everywhere is a tiny insignificant
piece of the problem. AFAIK, current Fedora packages build a 32-bit
'qemu' for KVM on i386 and a qemu-system-x86_64' for x86_64, which
happens to be called 'qemu-kvm' on both, to avoid clash with the base
QEMU binary names.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-18 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-17 20:46 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Replace tcg memory functions Glauber Costa
2008-12-17 20:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] re-register whole area upon lfb unmap Glauber Costa
2008-12-17 20:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] isolate io handling routing Glauber Costa
2008-12-17 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] replace cpu_physical_memory_rw Glauber Costa
2008-12-17 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] hook cpu_register_physical_mem Glauber Costa
2008-12-17 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] cache slot lookup Glauber Costa
2008-12-18 9:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2008-12-18 10:48 ` Glauber Costa
2008-12-18 11:00 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2008-12-18 11:07 ` Glauber Costa
2008-12-18 11:24 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-17 20:56 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] replace cpu_physical_memory_rw Anthony Liguori
2008-12-17 21:00 ` Glauber Costa
2008-12-17 20:54 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/5] isolate io handling routing Anthony Liguori
2008-12-17 20:53 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/5] re-register whole area upon lfb unmap Anthony Liguori
2008-12-25 20:08 ` andrzej zaborowski
2008-12-22 17:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Replace tcg memory functions Ian Jackson
2008-12-22 17:18 ` Glauber Costa
2008-12-22 17:22 ` Ian Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081218110014.GI23277@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).