From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LDeDC-0006La-7Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:12:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LDeDA-0006LL-Mi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:12:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60094 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LDeDA-0006LI-Gp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:12:08 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:63673) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LDeDA-0000fG-1r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:12:08 -0500 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LDeD8-0002V7-Qi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:12:07 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC] Load an OpenBios ELF image instead of OpenHackware binary object if found Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:12:03 +0000 References: <1229635267-16897-1-git-send-email-Laurent@lvivier.info> <1229635267-16897-3-git-send-email-Laurent@lvivier.info> <494B5F1E.9020505@aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: <494B5F1E.9020505@aurel32.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812191212.03769.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Blue Swirl , Laurent Vivier , Aurelien Jarno On Friday 19 December 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Laurent Vivier a =E9crit : > > This patch try to load an OpenBIOS ELF image instead of > > OpenHackware binary. Default behavior is used if the OpenBIOS > > (openbios-ppc32) file is not found > > Actually, I wonder if it won't be simpler to just remove OpenHackware > and always use the OpenBIOS image. I'm inclined to agree. Supporting two different bios just adds confusion, especially when they're= =20 both broken. Paul