qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Andreas Schultz <aschultz@warp10.net>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: gdbstub: packet reply is too long
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:08:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812202208.34044.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <494D69BF.6010008@web.de>

> Well, I'm using gdb over qemu and kvm in precisely that hybrid
> scenarios, but also in normal ones. Heavily. And I'm only able to do
> this because of the workaround. But I'm willing to learn about scenarios
> where it causes /regressions/.

I find that hard to believe. Doesn't it break horribly as soon as the CPU 
switches modes?

It's not just regressions that are important. It's the fact that once qemu has 
your automatic switching hack it's impossible to make it work properly.

> >> There are internal issues in gdb (hard coupling of current and target
> >> arch) that will not allow this to be fixed in the near future
> >
> > Really? I'm pretty sure other architectures already manage it.
>
> What other archs are comparably weird like x86?

ARM has multiple instruction sets/cpu modes (and can mix the two within the 
same process). PPC and MIPS also have something similar, though I'm not sure 
how well they're supported by gdb.

I suspect you may be approaching this the wrong way. Instead of trying to 
switch architectures, you probably need to teach the 64-bit debugger how to 
debug 32-bit code.

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-20 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1229776952.22890.2.camel@ws-aschultz>
2008-12-20 15:49 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: gdbstub: packet reply is too long Jan Kiszka
2008-12-20 20:35   ` Paul Brook
2008-12-20 21:00     ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-20 21:03       ` Paul Brook
2008-12-20 21:22         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-20 21:34           ` Paul Brook
2008-12-20 21:55             ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-20 22:08               ` Paul Brook [this message]
2008-12-20 22:34                 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-20 22:46                   ` Paul Brook
2008-12-20 23:44                     ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-26 23:30                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-12-29 14:58                         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-30 22:43                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-01-02 12:53                             ` Jan Kiszka
2009-01-03  1:53                               ` Jamie Lokier
2009-01-04 13:50                                 ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200812202208.34044.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=aschultz@warp10.net \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).