qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Andreas Schultz <aschultz@warp10.net>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: gdbstub: packet reply is too long
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:46:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812202246.39036.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <494D72E1.6020104@web.de>

> Do those archs also have multiple register layouts that are coupled to
> those different instruction sets? Do they switch the instruction sets
> via 'set arch'?

No, but neither does x86. You just need to teach gdb how to debug 32-bit code 
on a 64-bit target.

> I think x86 is (historically) special here.

I think it's just that noone's made the effort to fix this problem.

> Fixing this (once understood what are all the problems preventing a fix
> for several years now) is one thing, keeping the workaround for current
> gdb in qemu is, IMHO, another. Right now we don't have a gdb fix in
> sight, so I'm simply voting for reintroducing the workaround. That's
> all. We can kill it or make it optional once the issue is solved. But we
> should _not_ do this _before_ it is solved, causing only pain to people
> who just want to use the gdbstub.

I don't buy this argument. You already have to tell gdb which mode to work in, 
so I don't see any reason why you shouldn't also tell qemu.

Recent GDB interrogate the target when they connect, and the target describes 
the registers it has. This isn't currently implemented on x86 in qemu, but 
I'm pretty sure it'd be incompatible with dynamic switching.

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-20 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1229776952.22890.2.camel@ws-aschultz>
2008-12-20 15:49 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: gdbstub: packet reply is too long Jan Kiszka
2008-12-20 20:35   ` Paul Brook
2008-12-20 21:00     ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-20 21:03       ` Paul Brook
2008-12-20 21:22         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-20 21:34           ` Paul Brook
2008-12-20 21:55             ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-20 22:08               ` Paul Brook
2008-12-20 22:34                 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-20 22:46                   ` Paul Brook [this message]
2008-12-20 23:44                     ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-26 23:30                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-12-29 14:58                         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-30 22:43                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-01-02 12:53                             ` Jan Kiszka
2009-01-03  1:53                               ` Jamie Lokier
2009-01-04 13:50                                 ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200812202246.39036.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=aschultz@warp10.net \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).