From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LLRJ6-0001UR-AW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:02:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LLRJ4-0001UE-Kw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:02:27 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56750 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LLRJ4-0001UB-DC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:02:26 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:1331) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LLRJ3-000175-To for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:02:26 -0500 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LLRJ3-0005Af-44 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:02:25 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Variable video ram size option Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:02:21 -0800 References: <4967A96B.3020902@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <4967A96B.3020902@eu.citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901091702.22432.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Trolle Selander On Friday 09 January 2009 12:45:47 Trolle Selander wrote: > +#ifdef TARGET_SPARC > + =A0 =A0vga_ram_size +=3D (1024 * 1024); > +#endif This looks pretty bogus. > + if ( vga_ram_size > 16*1024*1024 ) > + { > + fprintf(stderr,"The stdvga/VBE device model currently has no use > for more than 16 Megs of vram. Video ram reduced to 16M. \n"); + =20 > vga_ram_size =3D 16*1024*1024; I'm pretty sure this is wrong. VBE alows arbritary sized virtual framebuffe= rs. Paul