From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LLxmc-0006BH-73
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:43:06 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LLxmY-00068n-Ca
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:43:05 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40043 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LLxmY-00068h-5K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:43:02 -0500
Received: from bart.se.axis.com ([195.60.68.10]:44067)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <edgar.iglesias@axis.com>) id 1LLxmX-0005aw-P1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:43:01 -0500
Received: from bart.se.axis.com (bart.se.axis.com [127.0.0.1])
	by bart.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED28F6403F
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:42:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from axis.com (edgar.se.axis.com [10.93.151.1])
	by bart.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48266402F
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:42:59 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:42:59 +0100
From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] sh: dcache flush breaks text region?
Message-ID: <20090111104259.GE26952@edgar.se.axis.com>
References: <4968DD28.3030709@juno.dti.ne.jp>
	<20090110195332.GD26952@edgar.se.axis.com>
	<49696E54.9030102@juno.dti.ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49696E54.9030102@juno.dti.ne.jp>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI <kawasaki@juno.dti.ne.jp>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:58:12PM +0900, Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI wrote:
>
> Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>> Another solution might be for linux to use a ocpb followed by a ocpi insn
>> on the line. IIUC that should achieve the same results net results.
> I'm not sure about it.  But I think we should not modify linux,

I agree.

The ocpb followed by the ocpi that I suggested won't work and I cant
think of anything better than what linux is already doing.

Best regards