From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LN6C9-0005xO-HQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:54:09 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LN6C6-0005tS-A8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:54:08 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54088 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LN6C6-0005tD-3H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:54:06 -0500
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:43058)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1LN6C5-0003jV-Gp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:54:05 -0500
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0EDs4gL008777
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:54:04 -0500
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:52:31 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Stop VM on ENOSPC error
Message-ID: <20090114135231.GA4559@redhat.com>
References: <20090114120358.GS3267@redhat.com>
	<20090114121147.GI24995@redhat.com> <496DD884.60608@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <496DD884.60608@redhat.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: dlaor@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:20:20PM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:03:58PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>   
>>> And repeat last IDE command after VM restart.
>>>     
>>
>> How is a management application to determine when this occurs ?
>> It is not desirable to poll for whether the VM is stopped all
>> the time, and we need a reliable way to detect this, otherwise
>> the user and/or mgmt app will just think their VM has hung. 
>>
>> Thus I'd suggest we need an async notification of this event,
>> and only enable this behaviour if the app controlling QEMU has
>> explicitly enabled this notification / feature.
>>
>>   
> Correct. There is async message for it (==printf...).
> Once the libmonitor is introduced it will be real async event
There is not printf in this version of the patch, but I can add it if
needed.

--
			Gleb.