From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
chrisw@redhat.com, dlaor@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Machine-readable or parseable qemu output
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:56:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090114165622.GD6431@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090114112938.GA11242@amd.home.annexia.org>
Although it's nice to have a monitor which is human-readable, many
programs have a separate monitor _program_ which connects over a unix
socket to the running app. For example, Bind has rndc, ntpd has
ntpdc, apache has apachectl, and Samba has smbcontrol.
This gives all the benefits of a machine-accessible monitor, including
asynchronous events, waiting for long commands (like migrate) while
still doing useful things (like change the CD while migrating? :-)
It's much more scriptable to have a separate program, and you still
have a nice text UI with line-editing, help, etc. Possibly a nicer
UI, since it's not limited to telnet/serial.
For QEMU, maybe it would work to define a machine-accessible socket
protocol, and move the current QEMU monitor code to a separate app
which connects over that protocol? If QEMU is invoked with arguments
asking for the current monitor over e.g. a socket, telnet socket or
serial port, it'd be easy for QEMU to fork/exec the monitor app. The
same app would be invokable from scripts.
-- Jamie
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-14 11:10 [Qemu-devel] Machine-readable or parseable qemu output Amit Shah
2009-01-14 11:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Daniel P. Berrange
2009-01-15 20:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-15 20:58 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-01-15 21:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-15 21:48 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-15 22:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-14 11:28 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-15 20:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-14 11:29 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-01-14 11:31 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-14 11:36 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-01-14 11:45 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-01-14 12:37 ` Dor Laor
2009-01-14 14:05 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-15 20:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-14 16:56 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090114165622.GD6431@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).