From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LOwxR-0006wt-UC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:26:37 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LOwxP-0006wD-Ur for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:26:37 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53476 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LOwxP-0006w8-Ns for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:26:35 -0500 Received: from caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca ([129.97.134.17]:51660) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LOwxP-000486-DN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:26:35 -0500 Received: from caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C8873DDA for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:26:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:26:33 -0500 Message-ID: <20090119162633.GO29175@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) Subject: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-ppc seems slow today. Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I just did an svn checkout since some of the changes in the last 5 days since my last build sounded useful. Well something not so good also happened. With the build from 5 days ago, qemu would happily use 100% of one cpu core, and run at a decent speed. Today's build seems to only want to use 10 to 20% of a cpu core and runs very slowly. Is this a known problem, or does this need some investigating? Is there any kind of bisect like facility in svn to help track it down? Anyone want to take a stab and guessing which commit did this? -- Len Sorensen