From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LPgWt-0003dJ-LZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:06:15 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LPgWr-0003be-Pn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:06:14 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32935 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LPgWr-0003bV-GG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:06:13 -0500
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:38474)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1LPgWr-0004en-2b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:06:13 -0500
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1LPgWq-0005qi-3Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:06:12 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] sh: SE7750 board definition
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:06:06 +0000
References: <4969B77E.7050206@juno.dti.ne.jp>
	<20090121090424.GC14537@linux-sh.org>
	<4977527A.70104@juno.dti.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4977527A.70104@juno.dti.ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200901211706.09350.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Takashi Yoshii <yoshii.takashi@renesas.com>, Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI <kawasaki@juno.dti.ne.jp>, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com>, "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>

> Now, I hope that we would reach a consensus about the spec of new standard
> board for SH-4A.  SH7785LCR is a choice.  And, as Iwamatsu-san suggested, a
> virtual generic board is another choice.  I'm not sure SH7785LCR's hardware
> spec is available or not. (Does anyone know it?)  If it is, I push
> SH7785LCR.  Otherwise, virtual board sounds good.

I recommend against using a virtual board. It means you have to maintain both 
qemu and a kernel port. The mips virtual board suffered exactly this fate, 
and IIUC is likely to be removed fairly soon.

Paul