Re: [Qemu-devel] linux-user/arm unsupported syscalls

["Jan-Simon Möller" <dl9pf@gmx.de>]

Am Thursday 22 January 2009 22:04:06 schrieb Riku Voipio:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:37:15PM +0100, Martin Mohring wrote:
> > Jan-Simon Möller wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I'm running some debian-lenny/arm binaries in user-mode emulation and get these 2 messages:
> 
> debian/arm or debian/armel ? Which specific binaries?
maemo with some bits of debian/armel
 
> > > qemu: Unsupported ARM syscall: 0x9000e5
> > > qemu: Unsupported ARM syscall: 0x9000e2
> 
> > Does anybody here know what the 0x9 number in front of e5 and e2 means?
> 
> oldabi syscalls.
> 
> > When such an error comes in qemu, for me usually a decimal number of a
> > syscall from any of the "linux-user/<arch>/syscall_nr.h file is printed.
> > But not a hexnumber with 0x9000 in front....
> 
> Because the error is being printed from a place than usual. Qemu appears
> to think the binary is eabi and is thus not reducing 0x900000 as usual
> when running oldabi binaries.
> 
> The warned syscalls (setxattr, getattr) go usually via the
> unimplemented_nowarn path, so no warning should be visible for users.
> 

Ok, setxattr, getarr are file-operations ? Need to dig what's the reason.

Best,
Jan-Simon