From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LQSui-0000RU-4g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:46:04 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LQSue-0000RI-Nn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:46:02 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48230 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LQSue-0000RF-IV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:46:00 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:45694) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LQSud-0006Bb-JS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:46:00 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:43:47 +0200 From: Gleb Natapov Message-ID: <20090123204347.GC17445@redhat.com> References: <4979D80D.307@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4979D80D.307@us.ibm.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: A new direction for vmchannel? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen , Chris Wright , kvm-devel , Dor Laor , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Avi Kivity On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 08:45:33AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Thoughts? > Looks good, but I am not to much familiar with p9. Will it provide us with stream semantics? How much work is needed to support this in Windows (what is your estimation)? Will migration be transparent to in guest users? -- Gleb.