From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRWfs-00074x-Te for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:59:09 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRWfr-00073A-4W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:59:08 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36176 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRWfq-00072i-Qy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:59:06 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:51743) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRV7J-0003jM-TE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:19:22 -0500 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRRYz-0007d3-5c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:31:41 -0500 From: Vladimir Prus Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SH: Improve the interrupt controller Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:32:07 +0300 References: <200812112252.17620.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200812141646.mBEGkdGR017687@smtp11.dti.ne.jp> <200812141957.37246.vladimir@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200812141957.37246.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901261632.07349.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: takasi-y@ops.dti.ne.jp Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sunday 14 December 2008 19:57:36 Vladimir Prus wrote: > On Sunday 14 December 2008 19:46:39 takasi-y@ops.dti.ne.jp wrote: > > # a patch attached is not to be commit to repos, but for explanation. > > Hi, > > > > > I have tested this only with SH4A and it's desirable to test > > > with 7751/R2D. However, I no longer sure I know which kernel > > > to use for that. Can anybody either provide me with instructions, > > > or test this patch with R2D for me? > > > > It doesn't work at least here for me (for r2d). > > It stops with CPU load 100% (and I had to power my PC off...). > > Bummer. Can you send me the kernel/rootfs combo you are using (either > link, or complete binary offlist) and I'll see what I've broken. Yoshii, I wonder if you've missed the above email. I would like to get these patches in, but for that I need to make sure they don't break r2d, and for that, I need to test with r2d kernel/rootfs -- preferrably the same that you use for testing. Thanks, Volodya