From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRWfE-0006TD-Gy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:58:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRWfD-0006Rn-0s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:58:27 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36104 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRWfC-0006RN-BO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:58:26 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:55462) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRWfB-0001Hc-C5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:58:25 -0500 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRWf8-0007BO-0r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:58:22 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] build system: Further improve quiet mode Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:58:18 +0000 References: <497C9398.3060006@web.de> <497DF491.4010808@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <497DF491.4010808@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901261858.19098.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > BTW, what do people think of printing CFLAGS? I find it not all that > exciting but if people like it, I'm happy to go with it. I don't find it that interesting either. Especially given we use at least two different sets of CFLAGS, and you really also need to know which compiler is being invoked. You can always use V=1. Paul