From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LRwrO-0001wQ-6D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:56:46 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LRwrN-0001ue-FX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:56:45 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59339 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRwrM-0001uL-O3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:56:44 -0500
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:41511)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1LRwrM-0006hz-EA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:56:44 -0500
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1LRwrL-0002fC-Au
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:56:43 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Add phenom CPU descriptor
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:56:40 +0000
References: <1233059726-8566-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>
	<497F5C93.9080609@codemonkey.ws>
	<200901272239.36183.paul@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <200901272239.36183.paul@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200901272256.41247.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>

> > Although this is a bit different.  We aren't actually emulating a
> > phenom.  We're just taking what we have and calling it a phenom.  I
> > suspect there's going to be a desire to call whatever we emulate
> > arbitrary things.
>
> I don't think we're likely to want the big list of cpus anyway.

Argh. I got that completely wrong.I mean we *are* likely to want a big list of 
cpus anyway. If done properly it should be fairly easy to maintain.
e.g. instead of missing out unimplemented feature flags in each cpu, add them 
all, then have qemu mask out the ones it doesn't implement.

Paul