From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] Terminate emulation on memory allocation failure
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:01:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090205120115.GJ2759@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233832126-9046-2-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:08:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Memory allocation failures are a very rare condition on virtual-memory
> hosts. They are also very difficult to handle correctly (especially in a
> hardware emulation context). Because of this, it is better to gracefully
> terminate emulation rather than executing untested or even unwritten recovery
> code paths.
>
> This patch changes the qemu memory allocation routines to terminate emulation
> if an allocation failure is encountered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
> ---
> qemu-malloc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qemu-malloc.c b/qemu-malloc.c
> index dc74efe..1d00f26 100644
> --- a/qemu-malloc.c
> +++ b/qemu-malloc.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,14 @@
> * THE SOFTWARE.
> */
> #include "qemu-common.h"
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +
> +static void *oom_check(void *ptr)
> +{
> + if (ptr == NULL)
> + exit(13);
> + return ptr;
> +}
Will all our atexit handlers cope with OOM too? In particular
we don't want them calling qemu_malloc again, or this becomes
re-entrant. If we want to go down this route, then abort() is
probably safer.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-05 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-05 11:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Unify memory allocation failure handling Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] Terminate emulation on memory allocation failure Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 12:01 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2009-02-05 12:22 ` Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 17:43 ` Ian Jackson
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] block: remove error handling from qemu_malloc() callers Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] audio: " Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] hw: " Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] targets: " Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] toplevel: " Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 17:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Unify memory allocation failure handling Ian Jackson
2009-02-05 22:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2009-02-06 8:47 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090205120115.GJ2759@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).