From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "René Rebe" <rene@exactcode.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Cutting a new QEMU release
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:36:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902051736.23247.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498B1EC6.8000504@exactcode.de>
> given the sheer amount of CPU sililcon without VT/SVM it looks to be worth
> keeping [kqemu] working. Maybe just to pull it into the Qemu SVN?
I'd rather not. What you[1] really need to do is get it merged into upstream
linux kernels. There have been several threads about this previously, the
short version is that it probably involves rewriting to use the kvm API.
You'll find that many developers (including myself) have extremely low
tolerance for out of tree kernel modules[2].
Paul
[1] Or someone else who actually cares/is paid to care about kqemu.
[2] Obviously there's a bit of chicken and egg here. Upstream submission
should at least be a fairly near-term goal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-05 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-05 9:13 [Qemu-devel] Re: Cutting a new QEMU release Steve Fosdick
2009-02-05 14:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-05 15:36 ` Rick Vernam
2009-02-05 16:27 ` Paul Brook
2009-02-05 17:15 ` René Rebe
2009-02-05 17:36 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2009-02-05 17:51 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-02-05 17:51 ` Ben Taylor
2009-02-05 18:39 ` René Rebe
2009-02-05 19:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-06 10:54 ` Steve Fosdick
2009-02-06 15:57 ` René Rebe
2009-02-06 17:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-06 21:47 ` René Rebe
2009-02-07 16:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-07 17:06 ` Laurent Desnogues
2009-02-07 23:46 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-06 21:53 ` René Rebe
2009-02-07 16:39 ` Jamie Lokier
[not found] ` <92CAE88C-36FF-4566-BD1D-ACA58C98CB0F@hotmail.com>
2009-02-09 5:01 ` C.W. Betts
[not found] ` <784D2534-F9CD-4EA5-BBEE-67E9DE196598@hotmail.com>
2009-02-09 5:42 ` C.W. Betts
2009-02-09 10:29 ` René Rebe
2009-02-15 15:25 ` Andreas Färber
2009-02-15 15:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-15 19:14 ` Andreas Färber
2009-02-15 18:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-15 20:31 ` Andreas Färber
2009-02-05 15:55 ` René Rebe
2009-02-07 12:01 ` Stefan Weil
2009-02-07 15:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-07 15:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-07 16:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-02-05 14:55 ` Rick Vernam
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-03 20:48 [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2009-02-04 14:50 ` Aurelien Jarno
2009-02-04 15:23 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-02-04 15:43 ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-02-04 16:01 ` Tristan Gingold
2009-02-04 18:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Consul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902051736.23247.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rene@exactcode.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).