From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVp1P-0001rl-Ay for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 10:23:07 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVp1O-0001rO-PR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 10:23:06 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48986 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LVp1O-0001rE-B3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 10:23:06 -0500 Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174]:43678) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LVp1N-0003cd-Vn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 10:23:06 -0500 Received: from [164.15.34.77] (helo=volta.aurel32.net) by hall.aurel32.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LVp1M-0006jo-0N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:23:04 +0100 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 15:18:03 +0100 From: Aurelien Jarno Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Mac99 (CHRP?) support Message-ID: <20090207141803.GA6533@volta.aurel32.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: The OpenBIOS Mailinglist On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 01:38:58PM +0200, Blue Swirl wrote: > Hi, Hi! > This set of patches adds basic support for Mac99 Qemu machine, As you ask the question in the subject, this machine is a NewWorld machine, and not a CHRP one. I think we don't really want to provide a CHRP emulated machine, so the best is probably to rename ppc_chrp.c into ppc_newworld.c. > provided by ppc_chrp.c. I've used the device tree of iMac DV ('99) as > reference: > http://penguinppc.org/historical/dev-trees-html/imac-dv-99.html > > The patches changes the machine to use OpenBIOS instead of OHW and > otherwise breaks OHW assumptions. On OpenBIOS side there are still > some missing bits. > > Comments welcome. Great work. I gave a quick look at the patches, they looks fine. However I still experience some problem with the PowerMac IDE emulation, especially with recent kernels, so until it is fixed (Laurent is working on that) I think we should keep the CMD646 as a default. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net