From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LWmxI-0005dk-Jl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:22:52 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LWmxG-0005ba-T9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:22:52 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38373 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LWmxG-0005bA-Km
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:22:50 -0500
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:48201)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1LWmxG-0004sd-7A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:22:50 -0500
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:20:06 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Bochs-developers] [PATCH] Read additional
	ACPI tables from a VM
Message-ID: <20090210072006.GB13234@redhat.com>
References: <20090209143017.GG28969@redhat.com>
	<336692845B5F4E10A22861C218D4EEBF@FSCPC>
	<20090209210027.GA13234@redhat.com>
	<4990A014.1040202@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4990A014.1040202@codemonkey.ws>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: bochs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>

On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 03:28:52PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> +static int acpi_load_table(int i, uint32_t addr, uint16_t *len)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    qemu_cfg_read((uint8_t*)len, sizeof(*len));
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (!*len)
>>>> +        return -1;
>>>> +
>>>> +    qemu_cfg_read((uint8_t*)addr, *len);
>>>> +    return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> void init_smp_msrs(void)
>>>>       
>>> Can you please diff against bochs cvs?
>>>
>>>     
>> Will do. This patch was initially intended to go to qemu patch series so I
>> did it against patched bios source.
>
> I'm happy to update to a more recent BIOS snapshot...
>
>>  And unpatched bochs bios does not
>> boot linux with qemu. IRQ routing problem or something.
>>   
>
> Unless upstream Bochs has regressed.  Did you apply the other patches in  
> the QEMU series?  Some are no longer needed I think.
>
With all qemu patches IRQ problem goes away. (One qemu patch conflicts with
the last bochs commit so I reverted it before applying qemu series).

--
			Gleb.