From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [6609] Parse full PCI device addresses (Markus Armbruster)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:56:05 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090212155605.GA18654@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902121539.26892.paul@codesourcery.com>
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:39:26PM +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
> > This code parses full PCI device addresses. It then rejects domains
> > other than zero, because these are not supported in QEMU.
> >...
> > + * Parse [[<domain>:]<bus>:]<slot>, return -1 on error
> > + */
> > +static int pci_parse_devaddr(const char *addr, int *domp, int *busp,
> > unsigned *slotp) +{
>
> If we're rejecting nonzero domains then having the parse routine return a
> domain value seems wrong. It's just going to make it harder to verify correct
> operation when domains are implemented.
+ /* Note: QEMU doesn't implement domains other than 0 */
+ if (dom != 0 || pci_find_bus(bus) == NULL) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "PCI device address %s not supported", addr);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ if (!strcmp(devaddr, "auto")) {
+ *domp = *busp = 0;
+ *slotp = -1;
+ /* want to support dom/bus auto-assign at some point */
+ return 0;
+ }
We return domain 0. I considered domain 0 as implicit at the moment, is
that wrong?
I can't see where you're getting at.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-12 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-11 15:21 [Qemu-devel] [6609] Parse full PCI device addresses (Markus Armbruster) Anthony Liguori
2009-02-12 15:39 ` Paul Brook
2009-02-12 15:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2009-02-12 16:18 ` Paul Brook
2009-02-12 18:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090212155605.GA18654@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).