From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYH8z-0000UF-Ld for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:49:05 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYH8w-0000Sb-OE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:49:03 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51182 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LYH8w-0000SQ-IF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:49:02 -0500 Received: from [84.20.150.76] (port=52441 helo=narury.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LYH8w-0006Dj-6L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:49:02 -0500 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:48:55 +0200 From: Riku Voipio Subject: Re: Re : [Qemu-devel] Cursor keys not working? Message-ID: <20090214094855.GA21941@kos.to> References: <200902130517.30406.rob@landley.net> <200902130924.45170.rickv@hobi.com> <708774.29183.qm@web24504.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <20090213205734.GU7945@hall.aurel32.net> <20090214112435.32d64c9e.mle+tools@mega-nerd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090214112435.32d64c9e.mle+tools@mega-nerd.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Erik de Castro Lopo Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Dustin Kirkland --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:24:35AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > > which also includes a patch: > > > >=20 > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=3D328839 > > > >=20 > > > > I applied this patch to svn 6617 and for me it fixed all problems. > > > >=20 > > > > Anybody else having similar key binding problems? Anybody looked > > > > at the above patch for inclusion in Qemu? > > Yes, someone already submitted this patch. They have been some comments, > > but no one has addressed them so far. > If someone can point me to the issues raised, I can see if I can address > them. Here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-12/msg00469.html The main issue is the lack of portability of the patch, the secondary issue is inefficiency. Neither should be hard to fix, the main work goes into just testing. --=20 "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJlpOHibPvMsrqrwMRAvTpAJ45hPH/XV4pqQyyphvPju71BHtDHQCfao+X kzekzFsOH2hnBL5B1d05xFM= =Kjzr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--