From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYjA7-0006Dg-G9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:44:07 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYjA6-0006Cs-2D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:44:07 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37704 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LYjA5-0006Cm-Pr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:44:05 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:35563) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LYjA5-0008Kv-Cl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:44:05 -0500 Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LYjA4-0006Wh-Ac for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:44:04 +0000 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:44:04 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Cutting a new QEMU release Message-ID: <20090215154404.GB24821@shareable.org> References: <1233825194.6637.4.camel@ecrins.fosdick.home.net> <498AF6FC.90803@codemonkey.ws> <200902050936.49909.rickv@hobi.com> <200902051627.21972.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Andreas Färber wrote: > There has been no rumor of any KVM port to Solaris. Linux kernel > integration cannot be the only criteria. Does Solaris not have their own equivalent to KVM, for running VMs? -- Jamie