From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZ0XG-00062I-CJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:17:10 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZ0XD-000617-Gy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:17:08 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53139 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZ0XD-000614-8L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:17:07 -0500
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:37626)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1LZ0XC-0006ue-TB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:17:07 -0500
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:14:12 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Bochs-developers] [PATCH] Read
	additionalACPI tables from a VM
Message-ID: <20090216101412.GK25994@redhat.com>
References: <20090209143017.GG28969@redhat.com>
	<336692845B5F4E10A22861C218D4EEBF@FSCPC>
	<20090209210027.GA13234@redhat.com>
	<4990A014.1040202@codemonkey.ws>
	<20090210072006.GB13234@redhat.com>
	<690772E95408420E816D0FC781CFDF83@FSCPC>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <690772E95408420E816D0FC781CFDF83@FSCPC>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
Cc: bochs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:22:18PM +0100, Sebastian Herbszt wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 03:28:52PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>>>  And unpatched bochs bios does not
>>>> boot linux with qemu. IRQ routing problem or something.
>>>>   
>>>
>>> Unless upstream Bochs has regressed.  Did you apply the other patches 
>>> in  the QEMU series?  Some are no longer needed I think.
>>>
>> With all qemu patches IRQ problem goes away. (One qemu patch conflicts with
>> the last bochs commit so I reverted it before applying qemu series).
>
> Can you please try upstream bochs with only 0010_bios-mark-the-acpi-sci-interrupt-as-connected-to-irq-9.patch
> applied from the qemu bios patch queue?
>
For some strange reason this no longer happens. May be something in qemu
changed.

--
			Gleb.